Blog Archives
More Drills Does Not Automatically Equate to Better Performance
I recently saw a question in a Facebook group from a parent trying to decide if he/she should change private instructors. While the question was about pitching in particular, I think it can also be applied to hitting, fielding, throwing, and other individual aspects as well as activities team coaches do.
The parent in question said that their daughter’s instructor always uses the same drills. Yet the parent sees all these other drills being promote on the Internet and seemed to be under the impression that performing a wider variety of drills would be better for their daughter.
(TECHNICAL WRITING NOTE: I know right now there are English language purists saying I am using a plural pronoun to reference an individual parent. That usage has actually been acceptable in many areas of grammar for centuries, and was changed in the AP Stylebook {which I generally follow} in March of 2017. So there – defensive rant over.)
There is certainly a case to be made that using a wider variety of drills helps break up the boredom or the so-called “grind” of instruction or practicing. There is also a case to be made that if one particular drill, no matter how well it is designed, isn’t working that you should try something else.
Let’s address those two points. The first is that coaches and instructors are not in the entertainment business – they are in the performance business.
Coaches’ main responsibility is to make sure that players’ skills are at a level where, when gametime comes, the players are able to perform those skills as effortlessly and flawlessly as possible. And that takes repetition.
There’s a reason certain close-in fielding drills are called “dailies” or “every days.” They are meant to be performed not just until players get them right but until they can’t do them wrong.
So yes, they may be mindless and routine, but that’s the goal. The objective is to make the most common plays mindless and routine so when they come up in a game players can perform them with the highest level of confidence.
The second point – that if one drill isn’t working try another (in case you already forgot what the second point was) – has more validity in my mind. You know the old saying about doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
A good coach will have a toolbox full of approaches to solving particular problems. Not everything works with everyone so even though the coach may have particular favorites, it’s good to have alternatives for when those favorites just aren’t working.
But no matter which drill you’re doing, it should be designed in a way to either solve a problem or enhance what a player is already doing to make it better. And that’s where getting caught up in the idea that the coach needs to keep coming in with new drills all the time is flawed thinking.
I mean, which would you rather have – a set of drills that the coach knows works, or a bunch of random drills that may or may not have any value?
And here’s a little secret for you: a lot of the drills you see posted on Instagram or TikTok or Facebook groups or other online sources are just garbage. There I said it, and I don’t regret it.
The Internet is a hungry beast, and someone who wants to become Internet famous as a coach needs to keep posting new material all the time in order to get those precious likes, clicks, shares, follows, and comments. Once they run out of good, proven drills they still have to come up with new ones or the algorithm will forget about them.
So then it’s a race to the bottom, posting ideas and drills that may seem ok in the moment but really make no sense when you look at them a little deeper.
Finally, I believe there are certain core principles to every skill that cannot be ignored. Players need to have those in place before they can get to the fancier stuff.
And certain core principles need to be pretty well in order before moving on to others. Work on them out of sequence, or decide to just let players slide by without really internalizing them before moving on, and you’re setting them up for a spectacular failure.
Here’s the challenge I will throw out to those who think quantity is more important than, or even equal to, quality when looking at drills. Is it possible that your favorite player is doing the same drills all the time because they haven’t’ put in the time and effort to get those drills right?
Perhaps the coach sees a particular drill is working but the player hasn’t done it enough to move from something they can do when they think about it to something they can do without having to think about it.
It could also be that there are some drills that are just so important that you want to continue using them regardless of how accomplished the player becomes. I know I have a few of those go-tos that help set players up for success faster.
I may try other things from time to time. But when crunch time comes, I’m going to use what I know is most likely to work, even if we’ve done it a thousand times before. Or even because we’ve done it a thousand times before.
The bottom line is you don’t want to do drills just for the sake of doing drills. They should be purposeful and specific, with an ultimate goal in mind.
Take that approach and you’re far more likely to be satisfied with the gametime performance that comes out of them.
Is Catcher Framing Worth It?

If there’s one thing you can count on, especially on the Internet, is if there is a prevailing opinion, sooner or later someone is going to offer a contrarian opinion. If nature abhors a vacuum, it’s also true that the Internet abhors agreement.
What made me think about it was a recent discussion I saw about the value of framing for catchers. For years now teaching catchers proper framing technique has been, as they say in the business world, industry best practice. A great deal of time and effort has been spent on determining the best way to receive a pitch to give it the best chance of being called a strike.
So naturally, the talk on discussion boards and Facebook groups is now turning to “framing doesn’t work and is a waste of time.”
Respectfully, I disagree. In my experience, when catchers learn to frame pitches properly they can help their pitchers immensely – if for no other reason than they’re not carrying the ball away from the plate and making the pitch look like an obvious ball.
Since I’m not tied to any one team or program, I get the opportunity to watch a lot of different teams play. Pitchers who throw to catchers who are good at framing tend to get more borderline strikes called than those who don’t.
Here’s one great example. This spring, thanks to another great Internet benefit, streaming video, I got to watch a student of mine catch several games, including some playoff games. This was strictly low-budget video – i.e., someone stuck a video camera up behind the plate, hit the button, and you could watch the game. No multi-camera moves, no chance of the point of view of the camera changing, no announcers to influence what I was seeing.
Quite frankly, I was a bit shocked by some of the strikes that were being called when my student, who is an excellent framer, was behind the plate. Pitches that looked outside to me (perhaps due to the camera angle) were getting called. Hitters were also a bit surprised so I don’t think it was all camera angle.
The proof, however, was what happened when the other team was in the field. The same pitches were being called balls. Same umpire, same camera angle, but different outcome.
(Who is this catcher you ask? I’m not alerting any umpires to the identify of this magician, but I’m sure she knows who she is. And no, that’s not her in the photo although this catcher is a darned good framer herself.)
You’ll see the same thing if you just stand in one place behind the backstop where a good framer is at work. Pitches that are being called balls for one team seem to be called strikes more often for the other.
Again, this doesn’t mean the umpires are bad. Far from it. It’s just that there are a lot of visual cues that go into making a call on a pitch speeding into you, and how the ball is received is one of them.
Of course, one of the things that makes for a great framer is NOT trying to make obvious balls look like strikes. That’s just insulting the umpire’s intelligence.
The key to framing is knowing not just how to do it but WHEN to do it. It’s also about being confident enough in your abilities that you don’t look like you’re trying to get away with something. Just stick it and move on.
The Internet is filled with free advice, and it’s worth the price. For my two cents, though, framing is a very worthwhile skill for a catcher to acquire and practice. Whether you want to believe it or not, it makes a difference.








