Blog Archives

Debunking the “One Size Fits All” Myth

Take a look at fastpitch softball discussion groups on Facebook or other corners of the Internet for any length of time and you’ll find parents and coaches looking for the magical drill that will yield faster speeds with greater accuracy for pitchers, longer distances and higher batting averages for hitters, more sure-handedness for fielders, or some other tremendous improvement. You’ll also find plenty of responses.

Here’s the thing to know, however: there is no magical, one-size-fits-all drill that will accomplish those goals for everyone. They may work for a percentage of the player population, large or small, but there are no universal panaceas out there. Here’s why.

Each human being is unique, with his or her own ways of standing and moving. Two players may look similar, but they aren’t identical.

In fact, from my own set of experiences working with players generally and testing them more specifically for Motor Preferences®, even identical twins will have differences in the way their bodies work.

Although they can still have that freaky twin telepathic connection.

The reason, as David Genest at Motor Preferences Experts (MPE) will say, is that people aren’t machines. Or sci-fi replicants.

With machines, you can build every single one of them to perform the same way every time as long as you’re using the same parts and following the same blueprint. That means when you put them to work they will perform identically and interchangeably.

They might also be easier to work with from a personality standpoint.

Not so much with human beings. While we all have arms, legs, torsos, bones, muscles, fascia, neuroreceptors, etc. – in other words all the same parts – the way those parts work individually and in concert with each other varies from human to human.

What that means is that the drill that is a breakthrough for one player could be a detriment, or even an injury risk, to another.

Take some of the drills for improving the leg drive of pitchers. A drill that emphasizes driving the hips could be great for someone classified as a terrestrial or “bottom mover.” They initiate movement from their hips, so enhancing that movement will likely yield some pretty good results.

Apply that same drill to an aerial or “top mover” – someone who initiates movement from her shoulders – and you could actually make her worse because you’re focusing your efforts on the wrong body segment at the expense of the preferred segment.

The same goes for hitters, fielders, and everyone else. If you use drills that place too much emphasis on one movement over another because you’ve seen them work for some famous player, without any consideration for how the individual in front of you moves, you can actually do more harm than good.

Both performance-wise and health-wise.

Does that mean you shouldn’t use any drills? Of course not. Drills are an important way of breaking down skills to help players improve.

But it does mean you should be careful about what you apply to whom.

Let’s look at team hitting practices. Unless all your players move the same way/have the same motor preference profiles, having one set of generic drills for everyone to perform is likely to be beneficial to some and detrimental or even harmful to others.

A better approach would be to create a set of drills for each group and have them work within their preferred profiles. That doesn’t mean you can’t have some crossover, for example hip drive drills for players who are more shoulder-oriented.

For best results, however, you’ll want them to spend 70-80% of their time doing drills that fit their preferred way of moving.

The same goes for conditioning and strength training. Terrestrial/bottom movers will benefit more by working on exercises that keep them closer to the ground, such as bear crawls, than by spending a lot of time on plyometric drills that require bounciness.

Although this might be a bit extreme.

Aerials/top movers, on the other hand, will respond best to plyometric conditioning drills. That doesn’t mean either group should be exclusively one way or the other, especially since most people are not on the extreme end of either.

But for best results the bulk of their time should be spent working on the things that will help them take best advantage of their natural tendencies.

So how do you know which drills to assign to whom if you haven’t hand any specific training in this area? Glad you asked.

For that we can turn to science. When you assign drills initially, see who responds to what. Then keep what works and discard or modify what doesn’t.

You can even do that within profiles. When I’m working with a pitcher or hitter I will often ask them to try something different. After all, if you do what you always did you get what you always got.

After a few attempts, though, I will look at what the effect has been. Does the player seem to be moving/performing better or worse?

If it’s better we’ll keep working on it. If it’s worse (adjusted for the fact it’s new), we’ll move on to something else.

And sometimes I will suggest something I’m pretty sure will create an improvement but doesn’t work immediately for that player. In that instance I will tell her to stay within the general idea but find a way that works better than I originally described.

You’d be amazed at how well that can work, because she’s not only doing the right thing but doing it the right way for her.

Also, don’t forget to ask the athlete for her feelings about a drill or exercise or movement instruction too. Athletes can sometimes be a little too coachable and thus won’t tell you when something feels awkward or out of place to them. Instead, they’ll just keep pushing through.

But if you ask them for their feedback, and encourage them to be honest, you’ll often get a better idea of whether a new idea is worth pursuing further or something you should save for someone else.

The bottom line is the idea of a “one size fits all” drill that can be universally applied to every player is a myth. It’s magical thinking that simply doesn’t work in the real world.

You need to know your players, try different things with them, and only keep what works. If you look for similarities in what works with your players you can build a profile for each of them that will save you time in the future because you’ll have a better idea of what they will respond positively to.

The net result will be happier, healthier, and better-performing players. And that’s a fact.

My good friend Jay Bolden and I have started a new podcast called “From the Coach’s Mouth” where we interview coaches from all areas and levels of fastpitch softball as well as others who may not be fastpitch people but have lots of interesting ideas to contribute.

You can find it here on Spotify, as well as on Apple Podcasts, Pandora, Stitcher, iHeart Radio, or wherever you get your podcasts. If you’re searching, be sure to put the name in quotes, i.e., “From the Coach’s Mouth” so it goes directly to it.

Give it a listen and let us know what you think. And be sure to hit the Like button and subscribe to Life in the Fastpitch Lane for more content like this.

Elephant and mouse photo by Vindhya Chandrasekharan on Pexels.com

Vlog: Absolutes v Core Principles in Fastpitch Pitching

Today we’re starting the new year with something a little different.

Recently Rick Pauly of Pauly Girl Fastpitch and the High Performance Pitching certification program and I got together for a video discussion about several topics related to fastpitch pitching. The driving topic behind it was the difference between absolutes and core principles in athletic movement generally, and how we view each relative to fastpitch pitching.

The discussion then branched out to a few other related topics, including the importance of posture, the effect of motor preferences when determining what’s optimal for performance, and the often-overlooked significance of deceleration as part of the overall kinetic chain.

It was quite the whirlwind of a ride.

So what are absolutes v core principles? We go into it more in detail in the video but briefly it’s the idea of whether there’s one “correct” way to do things – basically a hard line – or if there is a more of a range into which good pitching mechanics can fall.

In other words, do you want your pitchers doing certain things exactly the same way or does fastpitch pitching allow more room for deviation based on a number of factors? And even within that are there exceptions, i.e., pitchers who don’t necessarily do things the way they “should” but are successful anyway?

Which ultimately leads to when do you make corrections/changes and when do you just let them do what they do?

I think you’ll find it to be a pretty interesting discussion that covers a lot of ground. To check it out, follow this link to the Pauly Girl Fastpitch blog.

Really, it’s worth the trip.

Happy new year to all! Or happy whatever holiday is close if you’re reading this sometime in the future.

The Way You’re Training Your Players Could Be Hurting Their Performance – And Health

We’ve all been there. We have a player who turns out to be great, or we watch what great players do, and we study them intensely to figure out what they’re doing so we can replicate it with all our other players.

But then when we try to apply what we’ve learned we find it works really well for some, pretty well for others, and little or not at all for the rest. Some even see their performance level go down or even get hurt trying to implement what we’re telling them.

How can that be? we wonder. We did our due diligence and we know what we’re saying works. We’ve seen it work. So why isn’t it working here?

The answer is very likely to be related to something called “motor preferences®,” which can be simply defined as working with the way each body is designed to move from birth.

This is a concept I have been dabbling with for the last few months since learning about it from my friend and colleague Linda Lensch over at Greased Lightning Fastpitch. (If you’re in the Jersey Shore area she’s definitely the person to see about fastpitch pitching.)

I had previously taken an online course offered by Volodalen, a French organization that has performed 20 years of research into motor preferences and how they help athletes in all sports perform at a higher level while reducing injuries. But last weekend I had the opportunity to join a couple dozen of the best pitching coaches in the country for a two-day, in-depth, in-person training clinic hosted by James Clarke at United Pitching Academy in Centerville, Indiana. (Again, James is the guy to see in that area.)

The clinic was led by David Genest of Motor Preferences Experts, the only organization in North America authorized by Volodalen to teach how to identify and take advantage of motor preferences in this part of the world. To say it was mind-blowing and potentially game-changing is still greatly understating the impact that understanding your players’ motor preferences can have.

Obligatory photo with David, me, and Suzy Willemssen. No, I am not on drugs here.

I’m not going to go into a lot of detail here, but I’m going to share some of these concepts to help you get a better feel for how learning about your players’ motor preferences can help you train them better.

One of the core concepts is that athletes can be classified into one of two groups: aerials and terrestrials. These are not black and white classifications but, as David told us, more 50 shades of gray.

So while some players may be totally aerial or terrestrial, most will fall somewhere along a spectrum in-between those two extremes.

Aerials tend to move rather light and bouncy, especially when they run. They like being up in the air, with their center of balance leaned more forward. Think of a kangaroo.

C’mon Coach, I’m ready to go in.

Terrestrials, as the name implies, tend to be more earthbound. Their center of balance tends to sit further back, and they pull themselves forward rather than bound forward. Think more like an elephant.

Those are two very different movement patterns. So you can see why, if you tell an aerial to spring forward when they move you’ll get great results, while telling a terrestrial to spring forward will probably not get the success you’re looking for. One is designed to do it, the other is not.

Another key factor is which side of the body favors being in extension and which side favors being in flexion. All of us have one of each, and it’s built into our DNA.

So if you have, say, a catcher who can block well to her right but struggles to get to her left, it could be her left leg is her extension leg, which is good at pushing/extending, while the right flexion leg is not so much.

There are many other motor preferences, such as a preference for red or blue, that need to be taken into consideration to develop a complete, individualized profile of a player, but you get the idea. The more you understand how their body is designed from birth to move, the better you can train them to take advantage of what they can do easily while avoiding what will be more difficult for them to do..

Now, I don’t claim to be an expert in motor preferences. While I am now certified in motor preferences use by MPE as well as Volodalen, I am still very early in this journey.

Exactly how I feel.

But I have already seen results within a single lesson after testing a few students and making suggestions based on the outcomes. For example, a hitter who hitting pop flies on front toss suddenly started hitting bombs after we adjusted her swing to use her motor shoulder more effectively.

I’ve also seen a pitcher improve her stability and pick up a couple of mph in a lesson after changing how she launches. Several pitching coach friends who were at the clinic are reporting similar improvements just through understanding their students’ motor preferences better.

If you are serious about helping your players become the best they can be – whatever that ceiling is – I highly recommend signing up for a Motor Preferences Experts clinic. You can find a list the upcoming dates and locations here.

I will tell you it’s not cheap. Attending a clinic is a $900 investment, although you can then attend additional clinics for a refresher at no charge, at least as of this writing. But in my opinion it is well worth the expense, especially if you plan to keep coaching or teaching for a while.

If you want to get started but can’t make it to a live clinic right now you can also do the Volodalen online course as I did. That will be a $990 cost (which cannot be applied to the cost of live clinics in case you were wondering because they are offered by separate organizations). It is not as complete as the live training, nor as valuable in practical application in my opinion, but you do get videos you can refer back to again and again.

Either way you go, however, spread that cost out over a few years, and compare it to the benefits you and your players will receive, both in terms of improving their performance and helping them prevent unnecessary injuries, and I think you’ll find as I did that it is an incredible bargain.

And you’ll better understand not only why things that work with some players don’t work with others but also how to change what you’re teaching to what WILL for those players. You can’t put a price on that.

What’s the Deal with the Colored Tape on Catchers’ Chest Protectors?

If you were watching the Women’s College World Series in 2023 and/or 2024 you no doubt noticed that Oklahoma’s catchers had a piece of blue or red tape affixed to their chest protectors. I have heard some interesting explanations as to what it might be.

One is that it’s some sort of enlarged target for pitchers to throw to. If they’re having trouble seeing the glove, or if the catcher is trying to hide the pitch location, the pitcher can sight in on the tape and throw it there.

Nice try though.

Another is that the tape is the pitcher’s favorite color, and it’s being used to help her feel more comfortable and confident. That’s more on the right track, but still not quite there.

Actually what it is has to do with something called motor preferences. You can learn more about it here, but I will provide a quick background of what it is and how it relates to the colored tape.

The concept of motor preferences began about 20 years ago with a French company called Volodalen. They were doing extensive research in how to help athletes in many different sports (but primarily in track and field and cycling, I believe) perform better.

Through this research they discovered that all of us have certain preferences baked into our DNA. For example, when some people run they tend to bounce or rebound lightly off the ground.

They classified these athletes as “aerial.” Others tend to be more earthbound, pulling and passing as they run, so they call them “terrestrials.”

There are other tendencies as well, which I’m not going to get into right now because while I have completed an online course I want to wait until I’ve attended the in-person training to go into it in more detail. So I don’t quite feel qualified yet to offer a deeper explanation.

At least not yet, anyway.

Motor preferences have been used in Europe for about 20 years to determine an athlete’s natural preferences so he/she is being trained properly, both to enhance performance and prevent injury. It was brought to North America by Motor Preferences Experts, whose link I provided above.

Which brings us back to the tape on the chest protectors. The color and the orientation both have significance in how they affect the pitcher.

The color is determined by whether the athlete holds his/her breath in while performing an athletic movement or lets it out. In this case, an athlete who holds his/her breath in will have a preference for royal blue. (As I understand it not just any blue will do, it has to be royal blue.)

An athlete who empties his/her lungs during the act will have a preference for red. I’m told any general red will work. All of this has to do with the rods and cones in the eyes.

There is a test to determine whether an athlete is breath in/breath out You don’t want to just ask them. That test is proprietary so I can’t share how to perform it here but I will say it’s fairly subtle so you need to be trained in it anyway.

Once you know the color, you then test to see if the athlete’s brain organizes information horizontally or vertically. That will tell you whether to run the tape horizontally or vertically on the chest protector.

Getting back to our pitchers, if the pitcher tests breath in vertical, you would want to place a royal blue piece of tape on the chest protector in a vertical orientation. If she is breath out vertical you would place a red piece of tape vertically, and so on.

The purpose, at least as I understand it, is to help the pitcher feel more relaxed and confident before she goes into her pitch. Perhaps more focused as well, all of which will hopefully help her pitch better.

The colors and orientation isn’t just for pitchers, by the way. Hitters can put a piece of the correct tape on their bats before they get into position to help them prepare to hit. Teams can put stripes up in the dugout to help their fielders before they take the field, or fielders can put a piece of tape on their gloves.

The good news for those of us who are still learning how to test is that if you mess it up and get the color or orientation incorrect there is no negative consequence, at least as I understand it. You’re just not helping the athlete the way you were hoping to.

I hope that clears up some of the mystery around the tape. While the whole motor preferences concept has only been in the U.S. for a couple of years I think awareness is starting to grow and more organizations are starting to look into it.

Consider the colored tape the “gateway drug” into the deeper world of motor preferences and how they can help your athletes perform better and avoid significant injuries. More to come on this topic after I go through the training.