The intentional duck snort
This is an idea I’ve been toying with for some time now. How many games have you seen where the deciding hit was not a big blast or a sharp ground ball but what’s often called a duck snort, Texas leaguer or blooper — one of those weak, annoying hits that falls just out of reach of the infielders? Too often, probably, especially if you’ve been on the receiving end of it.
So I’m wondering: Why don’t we teach hitters to hit duck snorts intentionally? If you see the outfield is playing deep and the infield is playing at normal depth, a ball lofted weakly just out of reach of the infielders ought to put you on base every time.
Slappers are taught to do this. If the infield plays in and the outfield doesn’t, good slappers will try to lift the ball to the edge of the skin. Why not regular hitters?
I saw this up close over the weekend. We were in a semi-final game on a field with about a 200 foot fence. We drove a half dozen or more balls to or close to the warning track, but the outfield was playing back. If we had the bat control to just stick the bat out and drop it short into the outfield, perhaps we’d have gotten a few more runners on base and forced the outfield to come in, thereby opening things up deep.
Consider it a modified bunt. Only instead of dropping it short in the infield you’re trying to drop it short in the outfield.
I haven’t seen it done much if it all. But it sure seems like it would make sense. Don’t you think?
Posted on July 15, 2008, in Hitting. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.
Ken,Isn’t this post advocacy for the slap hitter? G
Not exactly. It’s more of expanding the skills of a normal hitter to include the ability to slap. We teach slappers how to loft the ball over the infield, but not non-slappers. Seems like being able to stick the bat out and make enough contact to get the ball out of the infield on cue would be valuable. But we never practice it.