Life in the Fastpitch Lane

Life in the Fastpitch Lane

Thoughts, ideas, tips, and general musings on the game of fastpitch softball.

FYI Blue, the strike zone is described in the rule book

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:18 PM and is filed under Rules and Umpires.

Just had to bring this one up after finishing up the season. The rule book of every major organization takes the time and ink to print its definition of the strike zone in its respective rule book. So why do some umpires feel they need to develop and call their own strike zones?

This past weekend we had one umpire in particular who was just unbelievable. His strike zone appeared to be the size and shape of a shoebox. Not even a good pair of Timberlands either. More like a pair of pumps from the Junior Miss area.

We were in the field, our pitcher threw a pitch that crossed the plate above the knees. The Blue called it a ball. We asked where the pitch was and he indicated it was too low. He also wasn't calling anything on the outside corner, and God forbid you should let the ball get any higher than the waistband. That doesn't leave a whole lot of room, especially for a finesse pitcher. What you wind up with is a lot of easily hit balls.

As reminder to the men and women in blue, the strike zone extends from the top of the knees to the armpits, and from one side of the plate to the other. The entire ball does not have to cross the plate to be a strike. As long as some part of the ball passes some part of the plate within the height detailed above it is a strike. That also means if you see a curve ball that actually curves as it crosses the front part of the plate, if it nips the plate it is a strike. Also, the height is determined by where the ball crosses the plate, not by where it is caught by the catcher. In other words, if a drop ball crosses above the knees while over the plate and winds up on the ground behind the plate, it is a strike.

I know a lot of you know it, and call it that way to the best of your ability. I also know it's not easy to do — I've done it. I hope that when you work with someone who decides the book rule isn't good enough for him or her and decides to redefine the strike zone you will say something — either to the UIC, or to whoever runs the scheduling. The game is a lot more fun when you let the players play it.

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URL for this entry

No trackbacks exist for this post.

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Page: 1 of 1

Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:04 PM Robert wrote:
This has been the worst year for us with the strike zone. Each umpire had their own and in most games it moved from pitch to pitch. It's hard to teach 9 yr old girls the strike zone when one pitch at the eyes is a ball then the next one is a strike. Tournament officiating was much better than our league play. Guess it's time to find a better league.
Reply to this
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:12 PM Ken Krause wrote:
Yeah, inconsistency is the worst. With the guy I described from last weekend he wouldn't give us anything low, then all of a sudden he called a pitch at the shins a strike. Rung up a girl from the other team who didn't know what hit her.

Were you facing adult or kid umpires? Paid or volunteer? That has some bearing on it, of course.

I will say in a couple of tournaments we saw some outstanding umpires so it's not all bad news. Locally I really liked the blues from GLOA. But it does drive me crazy when an umpire inserts himself into the game, or tries to "even it out" by calling a tighter zone on the pitcher he perceives to be better. Again, stick the book as best you can and I'll have no complaints.
Reply to this
Monday, August 10, 2009 10:36 AM Rick Cartwright wrote:
We had a mixed season with umps. Seemed to be whether they were training new blues. I think we had the same ump you did Ken. He had no idea of the slot, set up about four fett directly behind catcher (no kidding) and only called what he could see (not much). More than one tea complained and when they reviewed his mechanics, he was instructed and it got somewhat better. BTW, this was a qualifier. There were many crews set up in this way and the results were the same, poor and inconsistant calling. I know you need to be in there to learn, but not at those levels (14-18). Other tourneys they were great.
Reply to this
Sunday, June 13, 2010 10:45 AM HSA wrote:
We're lucky enough around here to have a pretty good cast of umps. However, two nights ago we had a sub in from the neighboring county that was just atrocious! His strike zone was similar, if not SMALLER, than the one you're describing! It's unfortunate that some people can use a position like this to abuse authority and ruin a perfectly good game. I, for one, am definitely even more thankful now for the blues we have! Hanna
Reply to this